Electronic Arts agrees to $55 billion private buyout by Saudi PIF, Silver Lake, and Affinity Partners – the largest LBO in history. What this means for gaming’s future.
When Gaming’s Biggest Deal Creates Gaming’s Biggest Concerns
Electronic Arts just agreed to the largest leveraged buyout in history – a $55 billion take-private deal led by Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund, alongside Silver Lake and Jared Kushner’s Affinity Partners. EA shareholders will receive $210 per share in cash, representing a 25% premium over the pre-announcement price, with the deal expected to close by June 2026.
This isn’t just a massive financial transaction. It’s a fundamental shift in who controls one of gaming’s most influential publishers – the company behind Battlefield, Madden NFL, FIFA/EA Sports FC, The Sims, and Apex Legends. And the implications extend far beyond quarterly earnings reports.
The Deal Structure That Breaks Records
Financial breakdown:
- Total value: $55 billion
- Share price: $210 per share (25% premium)
- Equity investment: $36 billion from consortium
- Debt financing: $20 billion from JPMorgan ($18 billion at closing)
- PIF rollover: Existing 9.9% stake incorporated into new structure
Previous LBO record: $45 billion TXU Energy buyout in 2007 (ended in bankruptcy 7 years later)
What makes this unprecedented: The sheer scale combined with $20 billion in debt financing for a gaming company creates a financial structure unlike anything the industry has seen.
The Players Behind the Deal and What They Bring
Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF):
- Will be the majority investor by far
- Already owned 9.9% of EA (rolling into new structure)
- Controls $1 trillion sovereign wealth fund
- Active in gaming since 2022 through Savvy Gaming Group
- Existing stakes in Capcom, Nintendo, Take-Two, Nexon, and others
- Previously acquired Scopely for $4.9 billion
Silver Lake:
- Major private equity firm with technology focus
- Historical connections to EA through former CEO John Riccitiello
- Led by co-CEOs Egon Durban and Greg Mondre
- Experienced in large gaming investments
Affinity Partners (Jared Kushner):
- Founded in 2021 by Trump’s son-in-law
- Received $2 billion investment from PIF six months after Kushner left White House role
- Additional funding from Qatar and UAE
The Controversy Nobody’s Ignoring
This deal immediately raises significant concerns that can’t be dismissed:
Human rights and sportswashing allegations:
- Multiple Western intelligence agencies concluded Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman ordered journalist Jamal Khashoggi’s murder and dismemberment in 2018
- MBS also chairs the PIF
- Saudi Arabia has faced widespread sportswashing accusations across multiple industries
- EA employees have reportedly expressed concerns about Saudi government ownership
Political conflicts of interest:
- Jared Kushner’s Affinity Partners received $2 billion from PIF shortly after leaving White House
- The timing and relationship between Trump administration roles and Saudi investments raises ethical questions
- Kushner’s firm involvement creates potential conflicts given ongoing political dynamics
Gaming industry implications:
- Content censorship concerns given Saudi Arabia’s restrictions
- Development priorities potentially shifting toward Saudi interests
- Creative freedom questions for studios under new ownership
- Long-term independence of major gaming franchises
What This Means for EA’s Games and Players
CEO Andrew Wilson will remain at the helm and stated company values will “remain unchanged” – a claim that will face immediate scrutiny given the ownership structure.
Immediate concerns for players:
- Will controversial content be censored or removed?
- How will LGBTQ+ representation in games be affected?
- Will development priorities shift based on Saudi interests?
- Can creative independence survive under this ownership structure?
Business model implications:
- Going private eliminates quarterly earnings pressure
- Could enable longer-term project development
- But $20 billion debt load creates pressure for profit extraction
- History of LBOs shows this often leads to cost-cutting and layoffs
The Debt Load That Could Sink Everything
$20 billion in debt financing represents massive risk:
EA currently carries just $2.2 billion in debt. Adding $18 billion at closing (with $2 billion more later) fundamentally changes the company’s financial structure.
Historical warnings are stark:
- TXU Energy ($45B LBO, 2007): Bankruptcy in 2014
- Toys “R” Us ($6.6B LBO, 2005): Bankruptcy in 2017
- Hertz ($14.8B LBO, 2005): Bankruptcy in 2020
The pattern: Massive debt loads from LBOs often end in disaster, even for established companies.
Industry Context: Gaming’s Revenue Stagnation
EA’s deal comes amid challenging industry conditions:
Gaming saw massive growth during COVID-19 pandemic but has since stalled. EA’s revenue flattened at $7.5 billion as digital competitors like Roblox captured market share from traditional publishers.
Strategic timing questions:
- Is this the right valuation given industry headwinds?
- Can EA’s sports franchises maintain recurring revenue?
- Will Battlefield 6 (launching October 2025) drive growth?
- Is $210/share truly fair given future potential?
Some analysts argue the deal undervalues EA, particularly with Battlefield 6 imminent and projected $2 billion in incremental bookings by fiscal 2028.
Saudi Arabia’s Gaming Strategy and Vision 2030
This acquisition fits broader Saudi economic diversification efforts:
Vision 2030 aims to reduce oil dependence by investing in tourism, sports, entertainment, and gaming. Gaming investments serve multiple purposes:
Economic goals:
- Diversify revenue streams beyond petroleum
- Build gaming/esports ecosystem in Saudi Arabia
- Create new industry jobs and infrastructure
Soft power objectives:
- Influence global entertainment and culture
- Connect with younger demographics worldwide
- Improve international perception through gaming
The criticism: These investments are often labeled “sportswashing” – using entertainment to distract from human rights records.
What Employees Are Facing
EA reported 14,500 employees as of March 2025 after continued hiring despite two major layoff rounds in recent years.
The debt financing and LBO history suggests contraction is coming:
- Private equity typically seeks cost cuts to service debt
- Gaming industry has seen massive layoffs across multiple companies in 2023-2025
- $20 billion debt load creates pressure for profit extraction
- Going private removes transparency around employment decisions
Employee concerns reportedly include:
- Job security under new ownership
- Content and creative direction changes
- Values alignment with Saudi government interests
- Long-term stability of the company
The 45-Day Window and Alternative Bids
Terms include a 45-day “go-shop” period allowing EA to solicit alternative offers.
Breakup fee structure:
- EA pays $1 billion if it terminates for board reversal, accepts higher bid, or pursues another deal within a year of shareholder rejection
- Consortium pays $1 billion if regulatory delays push completion past September 28, 2026, or if they breach the agreement
Likelihood of alternative bids: Given the $55 billion price tag and complexity of matching this consortium’s resources, competing offers seem unlikely.
Regulatory and Approval Hurdles
This deal faces potential regulatory scrutiny:
Foreign investment concerns:
- Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) review likely
- National security implications of Saudi ownership of major entertainment company
- Potential political backlash given human rights concerns
Antitrust considerations:
- EA’s market position in sports gaming
- Saudi PIF’s growing gaming portfolio concentration
- Competitive impact analysis
Shareholder vote:
- Requires majority approval from EA shareholders
- 25% premium creates strong incentive to approve
- Potential opposition from ESG-focused investors
Bottom Line: Historic Deal With Troubling Implications
Electronic Arts’ $55 billion leveraged buyout represents the largest in history and fundamentally reshapes one of gaming’s most influential publishers. The financial structure creates unprecedented challenges, while the ownership composition raises legitimate concerns about creative freedom, content censorship, and the future direction of beloved franchises.
For EA shareholders: The $210/share offer provides substantial immediate return, though some argue it undervalues long-term potential.
For EA employees: Uncertainty about job security and company direction under new ownership with heavy debt loads.
For gamers: Questions about how Saudi ownership and political connections will affect game content, creative decisions, and franchise directions.
For the industry: A watershed moment showing how sovereign wealth funds and political figures are reshaping gaming’s ownership structure.
The deal closes June 2026 – until then, expect intense scrutiny of every aspect of this transaction and its implications for gaming’s future.
Source: Reuters
Other News Articles:
