If the New York Times crossword just threw “Fire-resistant part of a redwood” at you and your brain went full static noise, you’re not alone. This clue’s sneaky simple, but it packs some botanical trivia behind it. Let’s break it down so you can get back to flexing on your crossword streak.
The Clue: “Fire-Resistant Part of a Redwood”
Redwoods are those towering, ancient legends of the forest. They live for centuries, reach skyscraper heights, and—plot twist—don’t burn easy. So when the crossword asks what part of a redwood is fire-resistant, you know it’s gonna be something low-key brilliant.
Popular Guesses (That Are Totally Wrong)
1. Sap
Sure, it’s tree-related, but sap is super flammable. Not the fireproof hero we’re looking for.
2. Core
Solid logic, wrong answer. While the core is protected, it doesn’t do much protecting itself.
3. Heartwood
This is the central, dense part of the tree. Sounds smart, but crossword says no.
The Correct Answer: BARK
Just bark. That thick, rugged outer layer is the real MVP. Redwood bark can grow up to 12 inches thick, and it’s basically nature’s fire-resistant armor.
Why Bark Is Fire-Resistant
- No Resin: Unlike other trees, redwood bark doesn’t contain flammable resins.
- Thickness: The bark is so thick it acts like insulation, keeping the heat from reaching vital inner tissues.
- Self-Healing: Even when scorched, the bark helps redwoods regenerate and keep on growing.
Redwoods didn’t survive for thousands of years by being basic.
Quick Tip for NYT Crosswords
If a clue sounds weirdly simple, it probably is simple. The NYT crossword loves a good misdirect—but now you’re onto them. Stay alert, stay smug.
TL;DR
- Clue: Fire-resistant part of a redwood
- Answer: BARK
- Why: Thick, resin-free, and nature’s version of a fireproof hoodie.
So next time this clue pops up, you’ll be ready to throw down the right answer like a crossword ninja. You got this.
🔥 Stay sharp, and may your pencils stay unbroken.
More Words:
