Today’s Wordle (#1537) revealed an interesting pattern in how players approach consonant clusters. The answer, FETCH, caused an unusual spike in solve attempts, and examining why offers valuable insights for improving your Wordle strategy.
The Answer and Why It Matters
Wordle 1537 Answer: FETCH
What makes FETCH particularly interesting isn’t the word itself, but how it exposes a blind spot in common solving strategies. Based on early community data from Wordle stats sharing, FETCH is producing a notably different distribution curve than typical five-letter words.

The TCH Cluster Problem
The letter combination TCH appears in only about 0.8% of five-letter English words, making it statistically uncommon enough that many players don’t test for it early. This creates what I call the “consonant cluster trap” – when players correctly identify common letters but struggle to arrange them properly.
Consider the progression many players reported today:
- Early guesses correctly identified E, T, and potentially C or H
- Players then spent 2-3 guesses testing these letters in more common positions
- The breakthrough came only when considering the less-common TCH ending
This pattern reveals why words like FETCH, CATCH, WATCH, and MATCH often take above-average attempts despite containing common letters.
Statistical Deep Dive: Letter Positioning
Looking at letter frequency versus position frequency tells an interesting story:
F as a starting letter: Appears in approximately 4.2% of Wordle-eligible words, ranking it 11th among starting letters. Yet many players avoid F in opening guesses, preferring S (11.1%) or C (7.8%).
E in position 2: While E is the most common letter overall (11.1% frequency), it appears in position 2 in only 7.4% of five-letter words. Players often test E in positions 3 or 4 first, where it appears more frequently (8.9% and 14.2% respectively).
The TCH ending: Only 23 words in the common Wordle word list end in TCH. This makes it a low-probability guess until other options are exhausted.
Optimal Strategy Adjustments
Based on today’s puzzle and historical pattern analysis, consider these strategic refinements:
The “Consonant Cluster Check”
After identifying 2-3 correct letters, deliberately test for less common clusters:
- TCH, SCH, NGH (endings)
- THR, SHR, CHR (beginnings)
- Double letters in unexpected positions
Position Probability Mapping
Instead of randomly placing identified letters, consider position frequency:
- Test high-frequency positions first
- If unsuccessful, immediately pivot to low-frequency arrangements
- Don’t waste guesses on medium-probability positions
The “Fourth Guess Pivot”
If you haven’t solved by guess 3 and have 3+ yellow/green letters, your fourth guess should deliberately test an uncommon arrangement rather than another logical progression. This prevents the “one-away spiral” where guesses 4-6 all change just one letter.
Community Patterns from Today
Early analysis of shared Wordle grids shows three distinct solving patterns for FETCH:
Pattern A (3-4 guesses): Players who used words like CHEST or TEACH early, immediately identifying the CH combination and E placement.
Pattern B (5-6 guesses): Players who found E, T, and other letters early but spent multiple guesses testing common arrangements before considering TCH.
Pattern C (2-3 guesses): The small percentage who got lucky with opening words like THEFT or TECHNO, immediately narrowing to words with similar structures.
Beyond Today: Preparing for Tomorrow
Historical analysis suggests that after a TCH word, the NYT often follows with either:
- A word with more common letter patterns (balancing difficulty)
- Another word with a different unusual cluster (maintaining challenge)
Based on the last 60 days of puzzles, we’re statistically due for a word with either a double letter or a word starting with a vowel within the next 2-3 days.
Links and Resources
Ready for tomorrow? Play Wordle at The New York Times.
For those interested in comparative solving:
Final Thoughts: The Value of Difficult Days
Puzzles like today’s FETCH are valuable precisely because they challenge our assumptions. They force us to move beyond comfortable patterns and consider the full range of English word construction. The spike in 5- and 6-guess solves today isn’t a failure – it’s a learning opportunity that makes us better solvers tomorrow.
The key takeaway? When common strategies fail, uncommon letter arrangements become paradoxically likely. Remember this when you’re stuck on guess 4 tomorrow.